|
9/11 - PowerPoint Presentations |
 |
|
|
|
9/11 - PowerPoint Presentations |
|
|
STEVE JONES Co-Founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. Steven
E. Jones is a Professor of Physics at 30,000-student Brigham Young University
in Provo , Utah. His Ph.D research was performed at the Stanford Linear
Accelerator Center in California and his Ph.D is from Vanderbilit University.
During his 28-year career as a physicist, his research has centered on
fusion and solar energy as well as archaeometry (the application of physics
methods to archaeology). He has taught graduate-level archaeometry at
BYU, and he says this work in particular prepared him for studies of evidences
of possible foul-play at the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001 . (110 min.)
9/11 Revisited: Scientific and Ethical Questions (2006)
Prof. Jones' paper: Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? |
2 June 2006
Steve Jones
I’m known for work on solar cookers for families in developing countries ? I invented a widely-used solar funnel cooker about a decade ago. With students, I tested and refined the solar cooker and then made and shipped out hundreds to Haiti, Kenya, Bolivia and other countries around the world. The first problem is getting people to believe that the sun can actually cook food. The next hurdle is getting people to think about and consider the needs of families world-wide, not putting one country’s needs ahead of others. Truth-seeking and caring for people are values we all relate to… In archaeometry (which I have taught at the graduate level), we use advanced physics methods to determine what happened in the past from available evidence. That is just what I’m pursuing in 9-11 research. When I saw the WTC 7 collapse videos, I immediately suspected something was amiss with the official explanation. With this background, we proceed to consider facts and evidences regarding the 9-11 disaster, and what this means to the peoples of the world. And why we may all need solar cookers in the future unless we act quickly to change direction… Solar Cookers, Archaeometry and
the 9-11 Disaster
|
4 June 2006
Kevin Ryan
A whistleblower examines NIST's explanation for "Why and How" the World Trade Center towers collapsed. As a laboratory manager and industrial scientist, Kevin Ryan spent years testing samples for conformance to national standards. During this time, while managing Underwriters Laboratories (UL) water testing division, he noticed a number of inconsistencies related to UL's involvement in the World Trade Center investigation being performed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In November of 2004, after attempts to obtain answers from UL's top management, he allowed his questions to be made public and, as a result, lost his job at UL. Since that time, Mr. Ryan has written several essays on the subject and has also spoken out within his local community. The NIST World Trade Center Report:
A New Standard for Deception
Credits for Audio files: A-Infos
Radio Project; With special thanks to PDX
9/11 TRUTH ALLIANCE.
|
7 June 2006
Judy Wood
The World Trade Center Towers
as Bio-inspired Structures:
Made with PowerPoint version 2001, Mac OS9
Prof. Wood's paper: A Refutation of the Official Collapse Theory |
24 June 2006
Steve Jones
Jones has written a paper regarding the September 11 terror attacks which has been accepted for publication in 9/11 And The American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, a volume edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, and scheduled for publication in 2006 by Interlink Books. The most recent draft of Jones' paper is posted on his faculty website at BYU. In this treatise, Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse, Jones cites evidence he says supports the hypothesis that controlled demolition, rather than simply the impact of jet airliners and the ensuing fires, caused the Twin Towers and WTC 7 to collapse. WTC 7 was not hit by an airplane, but did receive some damage from the collapse of the towers. Utilizing several published reports, Jones demonstrates that pools of molten steel and iron were discovered in the rubble of all three buildings, and says that the type of fires present were not hot enough to melt steel or iron. The physics professor also demonstrates (via still pictures and video clips) that all three buildings fell almost symmetrically, at near freefall speed, into their footprints. Jones also examines the official reports by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and
the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (aka
the 9/11 commission), which all conclude fires and damage alone caused
complete demolition of all three buildings. A central topic within Jones
essay is the contention that the condition and nature of the debris which
remained following the buildings' collapses was not consistent with the
scenarios documented by FEMA and NIST; in particular, along with the observations
of molten metal at Ground Zero by Leslie Robertson (WTC structural engineer)
and Dr. Allison Geyh (a public health investigator from Johns Hopkins),
Jones cites and includes photographic evidence [3], which he says shows
molten metal in the debris, and reports on sulfidation of structural steel.
Answers to Objections and Questions
|
|
