Home page
Scholars for 9/11 Truth

News and Email

----- Forwarded message from anonymous -----
    Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:24:45 -0800 (PST)
    From: anon
Subject: 9-11
      To: jfetzer@d.umn.edu

Dr. Fetzer~

  . . .

A couple points about 9-11. As you are probably aware, the law firm Motley Rice, which represents a group of victims' families, released to the AP surveillance video from Dulles airport which shows the hijackers passing through security prior to boarding Flight 77.

While much has been made of the fact that the video is not time stamped, there seems to be a more obvious question looming in the video, and I barely see it mentioned anywhere: is that really Hani Hanjour, the alleged pilot?

This would be a good point to do a Google Image search of Hani Hanjour. In addition to Hanjour's FBI photo, you will also find a snapshot of him (alongside Majed Moqed) taken from an ATM camera on 9/5/01. A clear image of Hanjour's appearance emerges: he's thin, high forehead, bony face, etc.

Now the Dulles video snapshot, and the man credited by the AP and others as Hanjour. This man, dressed in dark blue, is *clearly* not the same person seen in the FBI photo or the ATM picture, taken just six days earlier. It's not even close. This is a mix-up on the order of the "Oswald in Mexico City" pictures. The Dulles "Hanjour" is heavier, with a completely different face and hairline.

So taking for granted that 77 hit the Pentagon, this is startling visual evidence in my view that our government has no idea who was flying the plane, or if they do, they don't care to say. A juxtaposition of these two photos, the ATM Hanjour and the Dulles "Hanjour," would look good plastered across the top of your website.

Second item...are you familiar with Senator Bob Graham's book Intelligence Matters?

Third (trying in vain to shorten this email!), I wanted to express my agreement with the overwhelmingly good case for a controlled demolition of those 3 buildings, and I think Dr. Jones is correct in simply laying out the facts, asking for more investigation, and refraining from speculating about who rigged the charges, and how & why they did it.

I feel that if the point of this exercise is to compell people to risk doing enormous psychological damage to themselves by turning everything they believe about 9-11 on its ear, then it has to be done as gently as possible. You and I may understand fully the motivation and capabilities of the Project for a New American Century crowd, but my fear is that that info, combined with the physical evidence of demolition, will cause many people to simply shut down and be unreceptive to these ideas.

  . . .

  Anon